Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "Herbert B. Smith v. Henry Helbraun Et Al." by Supreme Court of New York # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Herbert B. Smith v. Henry Helbraun Et Al.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Herbert B. Smith v. Henry Helbraun Et Al.
  • Author : Supreme Court of New York
  • Release Date : January 24, 1964
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 64 KB

Description

Plaintiff, the former Superintendent of Schools of the City School District of the City of Peekskill, sues in this action to recover damages for libel. At the time of the publication of the alleged libel, the defendants were members of the Board of Education of the City School District. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was libeled by a resolution adopted by the defendants (as a majority of the members of the Board of Education) and published in the minutes of the board; and that in its preamble the resolution stated inter alia, concerning the plaintiff, that: ""Whereas the Board of Education of the City of Peekskill feels that greater progress can be made in solving the educational problems of the district under new leadership and, Whereas in the opinion of this Board of Education, the presence of Dr. Herbert B. Smith in the schools of this district is detrimental to the best interests of the school district and to the education of the children therein"". In the resolution's declaratory clause, the board resolved that the plaintiff be placed on indefinite leave of absence and that he be relieved of all duties in connection with the school system, but directed that his salary be continued to be paid to him during the balance of his term as Superintendent of Schools. The members of the Board of Education of a city school district have wide executive and administrative powers in the management and control of the educational affairs and interests within its charge (Education Law, § 2 subds. 14, 16; art. 51 [§ 2501 et seq.]), including the power to prescribe regulations and by-laws (Education Law, § 2503). In executing their duties, the members perform a State function of high importance to the people at large and within the city (Matter of Board of Educ. v. Wilson, 303 N. Y. 107, 113; Matter of Divisich v. Marshall, 281 N. Y. 170, 173; Matter of Jaffe v. Board of Educ., 240 App. Div. 402, 403, affd. 265 N. Y. 160). Hence, the defendants are clothed with an absolute privilege for what is said or written by them in discharging their responsibilities (Sheridan v. Crisona, 14 N.Y.2d 108, 112-113). The absolute privilege to act in the course of official duties should not turn on the size of the population of the municipality served, but rather on the nature and extent of the duties which are performed (Prosser, Torts [2d ed.], § 95,


Download Books "Herbert B. Smith v. Henry Helbraun Et Al." PDF ePub Kindle